top of page

Program Shopping in the Anti-Trafficking Industry: Building Sustainable Solutions

Writer's picture: Swop Behind BarsSwop Behind Bars

Updated: 2 days ago

Sasha’s Journey

Sasha’s voice trembled as she dialed the SWOP Behind Bars hotline. She was calling from a transitional shelter, her fifth program in as many months. At 32 years old, Sasha had survived years of exploitation and was determined to rebuild her life. But the path to stability felt like a labyrinth with no clear exit.


When Sasha first sought help, she was optimistic. A local program offered her a temporary motel voucher, which gave her immediate relief. But after the voucher expired, she was left with no plan for next steps. She turned to another organization, which promised job training, but they required proof of stable housing—a catch-22 that left her stuck. Frustrated and desperate, Sasha called yet another program for help with childcare, only to discover that her location disqualified her from their services. Each time she tried to explain her situation, she felt reduced to an application form, her story fragmented into checkboxes.




The SWOP Behind Bars hotline agent listened as Sasha vented.

“I feel like I’m running in circles. Every time I find something that helps, it’s like the rug gets pulled out from under me.”

Sasha wasn’t wrong. Her experience mirrored a systemic issue within the anti-trafficking world: the phenomenon of program shopping. While the hotline helped Sasha identify immediate resources, the hotline agent knew this was only a temporary reprieve. Without holistic support, Sasha risked continuing this cycle indefinitely.


Breaking the Cycle of Program Shopping for Survivors

Sasha’s story is not unique. It is emblematic of a larger issue in the anti-trafficking ecosystem: program shopping. This phenomenon arises when survivors move between programs in search of immediate benefits, such as housing or financial support, often without accessing the long-term services needed for sustainable recovery. While program shopping may appear opportunistic at first glance, it is a survival strategy born out of systemic failures.


The Systemic Challenges Driving Program Shopping

The anti-trafficking ecosystem is characterized by fragmented services, creating a disjointed network of specialized programs offering housing, healthcare, legal aid, and job training. Without centralized coordination, survivors like Sasha are left to navigate disconnected programs, often encountering conflicting eligibility requirements and incomplete solutions that fail to address their holistic needs.

This lack of integration exacerbates the challenges survivors face when seeking support.


Accessing these services is further complicated by logistical and systemic hurdles. Survivors often face long waitlists, rigid eligibility criteria, and geographical limitations, which disproportionately impact those in crisis. These barriers force survivors to "shop" for any available assistance, leading to repeated cycles of intake processes and limited progress toward stability.


Compounding these issues is a widespread mistrust in institutions. Many survivors have endured trauma from past interactions with systems that either failed or exploited them. This mistrust, coupled with societal stigma, makes it difficult for survivors to fully commit to a program, particularly when they perceive it as inflexible or disempowering. The lack of trust undermines survivors' willingness to engage and exacerbates feelings of vulnerability.


Adding to the problem, many programs prioritize short-term incentives such as gift cards or temporary housing over sustainable, long-term care. While these offerings provide immediate relief, they frequently fail to address the root causes of instability, leaving survivors cycling back to square one. This focus on tangible, short-term benefits often comes at the expense of fostering lasting recovery and empowerment, perpetuating the cycle of program shopping.


The Ripple Effects of Program Shopping

The ripple effects of program shopping extend far beyond the immediate experiences of individual survivors, highlighting systemic inefficiencies and broader consequences for the anti-trafficking ecosystem. One significant impact is the strain on resources. Organizations are forced to expend considerable effort and funding on repetitive intake processes and short-term service delivery. This approach not only stretches limited resources thin but also fails to achieve lasting outcomes, perpetuating the cycle of instability for survivors.


Missed opportunities for holistic interventions further compound the issue. Survivors, caught in the cycle of program shopping, are unable to access comprehensive services that could foster long-term stability and personal growth. This fragmented approach deprives them of the continuity and support necessary for rebuilding their lives and leaves critical gaps in their recovery journey.


Skewed data adds another layer of complexity. The repetitive nature of program shopping inflates metrics, creating misleading representations of success. These distorted figures obscure the underlying systemic issues that drive program shopping, making it difficult to identify and address the root causes of inefficiencies in the anti-trafficking ecosystem.


Program shopping erodes community trust. In fact it already has! Survivors, repeatedly encountering fragmented and ineffective systems, often become disillusioned and less willing to seek help in the future. This loss of trust not only impacts survivors’ engagement but also undermines the credibility of service providers and the broader anti-trafficking network. Addressing these ripple effects requires systemic reform to build coordinated, survivor-centered solutions that prioritize long-term recovery and restore trust in support systems.


Breaking the Cycle: Building Sustainable Solutions

Addressing the systemic issues that perpetuate program shopping requires a shift toward sustainable solutions that prioritize both immediate relief and long-term stability for survivors. Holistic service models, strengthened collaboration, trauma-informed care, flexible funding models, and survivor empowerment are key components of this approach.


Holistic service models are designed to meet the comprehensive needs of survivors, integrating immediate and long-term support. Programs must implement a comprehensive intake and assessment process, where personalized care plans address physical safety, mental health, financial needs, and future goals. Wraparound services are essential, providing therapy, healthcare, legal aid, and job training through coordinated networks to ease the burden of navigating disconnected systems. A “No Wrong Door” approach ensures that survivors can access the right services regardless of their entry point into the system, reducing delays and the need for redirection.


Strengthened collaboration among organizations is vital to creating seamless networks of care. Shared referral systems ensure that survivors are never turned away but are referred to a partner organization when capacity is limited. Coordinated case management simplifies the survivor’s journey by assigning a single case manager as a consistent point of contact, reducing stress and improving continuity. Cross-training staff across organizations fosters a better understanding of each specialty, enhancing the overall quality of care.


Trauma-informed care is a cornerstone of sustainable solutions, prioritizing survivor safety, trust, and empowerment. Programs must create safe environments, both physical and emotional, to reduce anxiety and foster healing. Survivors should be empowered through choice, giving them autonomy in deciding their care plans. Recognizing trauma responses as coping mechanisms rather than personal failings allows programs to approach survivors with empathy and understanding, reducing the risk of retraumatization.


Flexible funding models are essential to supporting sustainable outcomes. Funders should prioritize multi-year grants that allow programs to plan for continuity and provide ongoing support. Emergency funds enable rapid scaling of services during crises, ensuring that programs can meet survivors’ immediate needs. Unrestricted funding gives organizations the flexibility to allocate resources based on survivors’ evolving requirements, fostering innovation and adaptability.

Survivor empowerment must be at the heart of sustainable solutions. 

Survivors should have active roles in shaping programs, serving on advisory boards to provide feedback and ensure services meet real needs. Peer mentorship programs allow survivors to support one another, fostering a sense of community and resilience. Employment opportunities within programs give survivors leadership roles, enabling them to use their lived experiences to guide others while achieving personal growth and financial independence.


By integrating these strategies, the anti-trafficking ecosystem can break the cycle of program shopping, providing survivors with the comprehensive, trauma-informed, and sustainable support they need to rebuild their lives and achieve long-term stability.


Moving Toward a System That Heals

Sasha’s journey through the maze of program shopping highlights the urgent need for systemic change. Survivors deserve more than fragmented, short-term fixes—they deserve holistic, trauma-informed, and sustainable support. Program shopping isn’t a failure of survivors; it’s a failure of the systems meant to help them.

By prioritizing collaboration, survivor empowerment, and long-term solutions, we can create a future where survivors like Sasha don’t have to navigate the labyrinth alone. Instead, they can find a clear path to stability, healing, and hope. The work is challenging, but the stakes are too high to settle for anything less.


10 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comentários


bottom of page